Jump to section
Carsharing
Carsharing platforms enable people to drive without needing a personal vehicle.
Carsharing refers to any type of sharing service that involves the usage of a single vehicle by several different parties. It is distinct from transportation services offered by transportation network companies (TNCs) in that these vehicles—while they may be privately owned by one or more of the involved parties—are not part of an externally operated transportation network. Most vehicle sharing programs are short-term, membership based self-service car access systems with a network of vehicles for which members pay based on time used, distance travelled, or both. Carsharing can include any sort of vehicle sharing model, including traditional carsharing and timeshare/shared-lease services, typically accessed through smartphone apps or other digital methods. Well-known contemporary examples of carsharing services include Zipcar, Turo, Getaround, and Enterprise CarShare.
Variables to consider
Station-Based/Roundtrip, Peer-to-Peer, Point-to-Point & Fractional Ownership
The early days of North American vehicle sharing grew out of the “station car” idea in the late 1990s where vehicles were made available at passenger rail stations, and by 1999 there were nine carsharing organizations in existence—five in Canada and four in the U.S. For more than 15 years, carsharing was run almost exclusively as roundtrip carsharing, requiring members to pick up and return a vehicle from the same location. However, the carsharing industry has expanded over the past decade, largely due to advancements in smartphone technology, and has experienced an evolution in the types of operational models available. Newer carsharing forms include one-way/point-to-point carsharing, peer-to-peer carsharing where individuals access a privately owned vehicle fleet through a third party, and fractional ownership where individuals co-lease a vehicle. While many carsharing models have proven unprofitable and have seen dramatic closures, peer-to-peer options such as the GetAround and Turo platforms continue to grow.
Free-Floating Carshare
Free-floating carshare, which enables users to pick up a vehicle and end the trip anywhere on permitted streets or company-marked parking locations, had grown pre-pandemic. Daimler’s Car2go—later merged with BMW’s DriveNow to form the joint ShareNow service—was one of the first players to try out free-floating carsharing, and by 2018, it had grown to over 2 million members across North America, Europe, and Asia at one point having 14,000 vehicles in 30 locations worldwide. By 2020, however, Car2go exited the US market. Similarly, traditional automakers such as BMW entered the U.S. and European markets with carsharing models such as DriveNow and ReachNow, but closed operations.
Innovation Drivers
Carsharing can be considerably less expensive than personal vehicle ownership. Compared to using a personal vehicle for most transportation needs, carsharing services remove maintenance costs, fees, taxes, insurance, and the need to pay for long-term parking. They also remove upfront purchase costs, therefore offering periodic car access at a more affordable rate compared to ownership.
Carsharing can provide a more efficient use of resources when compared to personal vehicle ownership and usage, both in terms of resources necessary to create the vehicles and in terms of resources necessary to maintain and store them. With sufficient market penetration, shared cars could significantly reduce the number of vehicles necessary to service an area, resulting in fewer vehicles manufactured and less space needed for parking. In turn, this could result in fewer resources being allocated to manufacturing facilities, maintenance facilities, parking structures, etc.
Eric Fischer via Flickr / (CC BY 2.0)
Barriers
Carsharing services are not always cost-effective when compared to personal vehicle ownership. They typically have lower fixed costs than personal vehicle ownership, with flat membership fees rarely exceeding $100 USD annually, but often much higher variable costs based on miles travelled, time used, or both. For people who drive more than 6,000 miles/10,000 kilometers a year, personal vehicle ownership will be cheaper in most circumstances. Costs are particularly high for services that require roundtrips as charges include the time spent at a destination.
Carsharing services can be inaccessible or unavailable to some people. Many carsharing services rely on either smartphone apps or online interfaces to reserve, pay for, and access shared vehicles, barring people without consistent internet access or mobile data plans from accessing the service. Additionally, fleet-based carsharing services require a pickup and dropoff system to be in place, as well as a method for maintaining and servicing fleet vehicles. In some areas, particularly rural areas, the infrastructure necessary to support carsharing services is not always present, such as easily accessible stations or reliable internet and data coverage.
Carsharing - particularly one-way and free floating carsharing - is still an unproven business model. While one-way and free floating car sharing saw dramatic growth before 2020, businesses using those models saw dramatic reduction and closures after that date. Peer-to-peer services, conversely, have seen substantial growth.
Key players
Rental car companies such as Avis, Hertz, and Enterprise are the largest carshare operators, including brands such as Zipcar (Avis) and CarShare (Enterprise). These services are typically fleet-based, and sometimes use vehicles previously allocated for traditional rental services. Most are station-based and often partner with private property owners to allocate dedicated parking spaces for shared vehicles.
Automobile manufacturers or groups such as BMW, GM, and Daimler-AG previously operated carsharing services. As with rental car companies, these services were typically fleet-based, with shared vehicles provided by the parent automobile manufacturer. While many manufacturer-operated carshare programs shuttered during the COVID-19 pandemic, some legacy systems remain robust. Modo, the Canadian carshare company started by the British Columbia Automobile Association in 1997, for example, remains operational in Vancouver and other cities in British Columbia. Between 2024-2025, Modo was included alongside Evo (a free-floating private carshare company) in TransLink's Mobility as a Service (MaaS) pilot program, RideLink.
Peer-to-peer carsharing platforms also exist, with companies such as Getaround and Turo exclusively oriented around carsharing platforms. In contrast to services operated by rental car companies or automobile manufacturers, these companies operate on a peer-to-peer model, connecting private vehicle owners willing to rent out their vehicles to prospective renters.
Use case examples
Carsharing offers car access when personal vehicle ownership isn’t feasible or necessary. People living in dense urban areas with limited to no long-term parking, for example, are using carsharing services as an alternative to trying to find a long-term parking solution for a personal vehicle. This can also apply to people who cannot purchase a personal vehicle of their own for other reasons as well, such as lease restrictions or lack of access to credit and banking services necessary for vehicle ownership. People who only need to drive a vehicle irregularly or for special occasions are also using carsharing services to meet their transportation needs.
People use carsharing when personal vehicle ownership would be cost inefficient or cost prohibitive. People in situations where the cost of storing and maintaining a personal vehicle outweighs the benefit they would get from personal vehicle ownership are using carsharing services as a cost-effective alternative when making trips that require driving. Similarly, people who simply cannot afford the upfront and ongoing expenses of personal vehicle ownership in the first place are using carsharing services on an as-needed basis.
Carsharing services can reduce reliance on personal vehicles when travelling. Rather than driving their own personal vehicles on long road trips or resorting to taxis/shuttles, ridehailing services, or rental cars after travelling to a destination, people are instead using carsharing services for on-demand mobility needs. This is particularly true of free-floating carsharing services such as ShareNow, as they can provide travellers with flexible self-service mobility options at a price point often much lower than those found among TNCs, taxis/shuttles, and conventional vehicle rentals.
Carshare can be part of a multimodal transportation network, including integrated into Mobility as a Service (MaaS) programs across the world. Examples include as RideLink in Vancouver and Jelbi in Berlin, both of which included multiple carshare options.
Pilots & developments
1948 – Swiss housing cooperative Selbstfahrergemeinschaft, or “Sefage,” implements one of the first carshare programs. The project, while successful, is localized around Zürich and remains small.
1971 – A service called ProcoTip launches in Montpellier, France, which aims to provide a more widespread service than previous efforts such as Sefage. The service lasted two years before shutting down.
1974 – Witkar, one of the first fleet-based car sharing services is introduced, starting operations in Amsterdam. The Dutch service utilized distinctive electric vehicles operating on a station-based model, and remained in operation until 1986.
1983 – Two carshare systems launch in the United States. Both carshare systems, Purdue University’s Mobility Enterprise and Short-Term Auto Rental (STAR) in San Francisco, launch as short-term carshare experiments.
February 1998 - The first official carsharing program begins in the United States when CarSharing Portland launches in Portland, Oregon.
January 2000 - Flexcar and King County Metro collaborate to form possibly the first public-private carsharing partnership in the United States.
April 2000 - Zipcar launches as a membership-based car-sharing company in Cambridge, Massachusetts that built technology to enable real-time self-service reservations, car access, and billing.
June 2009 - Zipcar and Apple reveal the new Zipcar app, an app created in collaboration between the two companies to make it easier for users to reserve Zipcar vehicles.
September 2010 - Governor Schwarzenegger signs Assembly Bill 1971 into law, making California the first state to establish a regulatory framework for carsharing.
December 2010 - Car rental company Hertz creates their own carshare service, starting a trend for other car rental companies in the United States.
December 2012 - Enterprise creates their own carsharing service, Enterprise CarShare.
2015 - Carsharing membership in the United States declines four percent year-over-year, the first decline in US carsharing since its creation.
2015 - Despite declines in US carshare usage, business consulting firm Frost & Sullivan estimates there are 7 million careshare users worldwide in 2015, double the number of users in 2013.
2016 - General Motors launched its carshare program, Maven, in select US cities. Maven shuttered in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic.
2015-2025 - Los Angeles Department of Transportation piloted electric carsharing in underserved neighborhoods in Los Angeles. In 2025, the pilot transitioned to a carshare service operated by Blink Mobility.
December 2019 - SHARE NOW, a popular smartphone-enabled Car2Go carsharing service in North America and Europe, announces they will cease all operations in North America, London, Brussels, and Florence, effective February 29, 2020.
2020 - The COVID-19 pandemic hit many carsharing programs hard, with a number of both private and automobile-company operators ending operations during this time.
2022 - present - Post-pandemic, carsharing remains relatively limited to either dominant station-based providers like Zipcar, or community-specific carshare programs, although exceptions exist. Community carshare programs often aim to promote mobility via clean electric vehicles, often in partnership with larger carshare operators. For example, Our Community Carshare in Sacramento and Forth Mobility provide free electric carshare access at select housing sites.
Related Impacts
Transit
Transit is the most efficient way of moving people, but many transit systems are facing challenges. What happens when AVs arrive?
Auto-Oriented Land Uses
How will land use patterns shift if land previously dedicated to auto-oriented uses becomes available for redevelopment?
Parking & Urban Form
How will the reduced need for parking caused by the proliferation of new mobility technologies impact urban form?
See something that should be here that isn't? Have a suggestion to make?