When digitizing curb management, it is essential to ensure the process does not exacerbate inequities or introduce new ones. Curb data often helps to optimize space, reduce inefficiencies, and improve urban mobility as long as they are implemented holistically within a city and not just within better-resourced communities. This section highlights key considerations related to equity in curb data collection, policy design, and implementation.

Key findings



Data Collection & Accessibility Gaps: Data collection tools provide opportunities for neighborhoods, but if they are only deployed in better-resourced neighborhoods, all benefits become irrelevant. Inconsistent signage can also provide inaccuracies within the data. If underserved communities are excluded from data because of these inaccuracies the data results can lead to inequitable curb allocations and missed opportunities for investment.



Privacy & Surveillance Concerns: The technologies used for data collection can offer efficiency but at the cost of privacy concerns, particularly among communities with disproportionate policing. Boston and other cities are growing aware that automated systems must be deployed with care to quell concerns surrounding privacy while also ensuring that the collected data remains accurate.



Designing for Inclusive Curb Access: Designing policies for a broad range of users creates more inclusive data collection. This inclusivity also tends to improve access to jobs, education, and essential services as well as increased transparency through open data standards. A holistic view of curb space can be an opportunity to advance equity as well within the broader mobility system.



View



View Report PDF



Behind a hard paywall (paid accounts only)



Behind a soft paywall (limited views allowed until a paid account is required)